Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Volleyball
Reply to "USAV Bids 2026 ... and Results"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=FPYCparent]Here are my USAV 18s GJNCs observations from Reno: AES page for the weekend: https://results.advancedeventsystems.com/event/PTAwMDAwNDIwOTY90/home Paramount 18s ... where to begin. This team got a bid very late in the process. I understand this team had numerous season-ending injuries, to the point where they only had 6 players at some events. A Paramount parent told me that the most of the healthy 18s players "left" early (given that the team hadn't earned a bid at this point. [b]So, Paramount ultimately sent their 16-2s team and coaches to Reno.[/b] They may have pulled back two of the original-and-still-healthy 18s and one 17s player who was returning from her own injury. Team went 2-5, which may not be bad for what was really a 16s teams.[/quote] If it’s true that Paramount sent a 16-2 team, then they probably should have declined the bid and let another team have the opportunity. Imagine if Blue Ridge had not declined their bids and instead just fielded and sent a lower team. Or maybe this is just the excuse being given because the team struggled this year. Injuries happen, but for top teams with 13+ player rosters, I don’t think injuries fully explain a season like that. It just seems that recruitment to replace players that left was poor.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics