Reply to Democracy is overrated

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Democracy is overrated - China won "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]American democracy was originally designed to allow individuals and local communities to chart their own course.  This made perfect sense in an 18th century agrarian society where most of your needs could be met through local enterprise.

But American democracy is poorly suited to the 21st century.  Everyone pulling in a different direction under the guise of "freedom" is simply chaos.  Now we are constantly at war with each other - urban vs. rural, black vs. white, immigrant vs. native, north vs. south.

I don't know that China has the perfect system.  But the fact that there is a vision for national greatness, and a political system that allows infrastructure to be built and problems to be solved, seems like an improvement on America.[/quote]

Not quite.  American "democracy" worked because the franchise was limited to those who exercise it for the betterment of western civilization.  Expanding it to unqualified people has been an abject disaster.  What's worse, "democracy" only works when the people share common values.  Increased diversity leads to diverse, not common, values, so democracy fails.  Even Aristotle understood this basic concept thousands of years ago.

Chinese governance suffers from many problems, especially the inevitable transfer of power from Xi.  However, their problems are better than the West's because the West is run by incompetent leaders who hate their own people.  [/quote]

Some fact checks to rebut 5 claims made in the exchange above:

1. "American democracy is poorly suited to the 21st century."
Political scientists note that while modern democracies face polarization, research from institutions such as Freedom House and the Varieties of Democracy Project shows that democratic systems still outperform authoritarian ones on innovation, economic resilience, disaster response, and long‑term stability.
Authoritarian efficiency is often overstated; China’s own scholars have documented delays, corruption, and policy failures hidden by censorship.  And, some of the polarization is driven by disinformation injected into democratic societies by authoritarian ones such as Russia and China.

2. "China has a vision for national greatness and solves problems better."
Analyses from the World Bank and OECD show that aspects of China’s rapid infrastructure build‑out was poorly planned, and produced massive debt, unused projects, and local‑government insolvency.

Independent reporting has documented issues such as:
- ghost cities
- high‑speed rail lines operating at a loss
- demographic decline
- rampant youth unemployment
- local corruption that central authorities struggle to control

These are not signs of a system that "solves problems" more effectively; they are signs of a system where problems are harder to acknowledge publicly.

3. "Democracy only worked when the franchise was limited to certain people."
This claim contradicts the historical record.  Studies from the Brookings Institution, Stanford, and Harvard show that expanding the franchise correlates with higher economic growth, better public health, and more stable institutions.  Limiting voting rights based on subjective notions of who is "qualified" has been widely documented as a tool for entrenching power, not improving governance.

4. "Diversity makes democracy fail."
Comparative political research does not support this. Countries such as Canada, Switzerland, Belgium, and India demonstrate that diverse democracies can function effectively when institutions are strong and inclusive.  The key variable is not diversity, it is institutional design, rule of law, and civic trust.

5. "The West is run by leaders who hate their own people."
This is a rhetorical assertion, not a factual one.  Political scientists classify such statements as delegitimizing narratives, common in polarized environments but unsupported by empirical evidence.  Democratic governments operate under transparency requirements, elections, judicial review, and independent media: mechanisms that ultimately make "hating their own people" an unsustainable claim.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics