Reply to DCI Parent Petition

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DCI Parent Petition "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If 94% of the people who worked for me said they don’t have confidence in me I’d be humiliated. And I’d resign.

Rosskamm is desperately clinging on because he needs this grift. [/quote]

Sincerely if 94% said they didn’t have confidence in me my first question would be “I didn’t ask you”.

I’m not worried that the staff has no confidence. [/quote]

WTF!!!
94% of your staff says they don’t have confidence in you, and you respond, “I didn’t ask you”. 
What kind of psychopath thinks this way
Are you our President lol[/quote]

I get why you feel that way but ultimately the boss often has to make hard decisions. As a parent I want to understand why staff voted this way. That’s the part I’m having an issue understanding. [/quote]

Really? This again? Many of us are "bosses" who have to make hard decisions that are unpopular.

That's vastly different from being so bad at your job that 94% of your employees vote that they have no confidence in you.

As a point of reference, the current president has a 40% approval rating. [/quote]

You keep pointing to the 94% as if that’s necessary and sufficient. To a large plurality, if not majority here, there’s not enough detail in anything provided up to this point for that to be the case.

The partisans against the head of school on here and IRL have negatively polarized other parents because their ability to argue is so low. Honestly I would be worried to see this level of argument from a high school kid, let alone an adult who passed a writing class in college.

[/quote]

So you're at the insults stage now? You’re the only one dismissing the staff’s vote and continually complaining there are no details despite ample evidence otherwise.

A six-page staff letter with five numbered categories of specific concerns, dates, names, and figures has been shared in this thread multiple times. 94% of the staff have confidence in the ED.

If that’s not enough detail, I’d genuinely like to know what would be. Not rhetorically. What specific question do you have that hasn’t been answered? I’ll answer it.

As for the quality of argument: attacking how people write instead of what they’re saying is what you do when you don’t have a response to what they’re saying.

The 94% isn’t the whole argument. It’s one data point in a documented case. If you’ve been in this thread and still think there’s no detail, that’s a choice, not a conclusion.[/quote]

The letter makes claims about things that happened- specifically the undermining of the IB model where I’m most interested- and doesn’t provide specific examples.

Again, you seem to be unable to distinguish between a claim, evidence for a claim, and an emotional appeal. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics