Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Taylor's Feb. Rec for Woodward Boundary Study"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The issue is the demographics of the new WJ. Do the math. It’s another Whitman (less diverse and richer than current WJ) while Woodward is just a mile away and will be a very different school.[/quote]What do you mean by different?[/quote] Wealth. A lot less of it.[/quote] Don’t turn on the new Woodward families when MCPS divided the schools and even the WJ cluster in an unexpected way. The way they split KP and GP puts all the single family homes in WJ rather than Woodward. [/quote] Is there a more close up map to show where gp and kp split?[/quote] GPES has many multi family houses still going to WJ. The Parkside condos, stoneybrook, apts near Grosvenor. The islands from GPES that didn’t get WJ make complete sense. They should go to Woodward. One is directly next to Woodward. Option B was the right call. They will do elementary boundary soon to mitigate some of the split articulation issues. KPES is under capacity and Ashburton is over capacity. It will get resolved. [b]Looks like all the Option B signs on Strathmore worked[/b].[/quote] They were desperate to avoid Woodward. I won't celebrate yet. MCPS may not ceoncentrate poverty in Woodward and make both schools more similar in final approval. It will depend on how hard Old Farm/North FArm and Luxmanor area lobbies.[/quote] As they should have been desperate to avoid Woodward. Fashion design? It grabs from Wheaton Woods now too. No thank you Attention will be on Wootton. This Woodward rec is done deal. Note that Taylor only submitted this rec for Woodward. In the Crown study he submitted a recommendation plus an alternative. [/quote] The BOE members can if they want to not appear completely useless stand up bravely against racial segregation by moving Viers Mill ES to WJ.[/quote] You lost credibility there. VM “improved” from Wheaton to Woodward too. You don’t see VM clamoring for WJ. GPE and KPE keeps status quo for its core. [/quote] I am from VM and prefer WJ.[/quote] Same. It’s a perfect solution. Move VM to WJ. Move all of GP to Woodward. FARMS rates are more evenly distributed. GP remains united just like they want[/quote] You are for the redistribution of wealth to VM. Shocking perspective for someone who lives in VM. You want to be able to better afford your addition. Woodward is an upgrade. You instead want to take WJ from GP where they have decades long relationship. [/quote] Yah, it's a relationship between people, lol. Give it a break. Nothing wrong in VM parents to want to join WJ. GP does not have any unuversal rights to attend WJ when its making Woodward so much higher FARMS. - BCC parent[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics