Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Realignment for SEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wondering where that poster was that used to talk about how weak our TW provision was and how the agency was going to win. Guess they don't have anything to say now.[/quote] Congrats on the win. Too bad nothing will change. [/quote] "It's too bad she won't live! ...but then again, who does?"[/quote] I, for one, expect the agency to abide by a binding arbitration decision rather than filing a frivolous appeal. And that should be the expectation. Any other action will show that the Chairman detests staff, veneer of collegiality or not. [/quote] The Chairman does detest us all. He has told people that we are grossly overpaid. He wants to cut our benefits like the Supplemental Retirement. He hates telework. He hates everything that makes people feel good about their work. If the agency appeals, even under the excuse of being forced to do it by OPM/OMB, it will be yet another example of the above. The message from OHR essentially telling us not to get our hopes up is an indication they will likely appeal. Because a good PR org would have already have options A, B, or C ready depending on the arbitrator’s decision. Don’t get your hopes up![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics