Reply to Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]
County search system https://plus.fairfaxcounty.gov/CitizenAccess/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Enforcement&capID1=REC25&capID2=00000&capID3=02IUG&agencyCode=FFX

enter the address under Enforcement.  That shows some complaints directed to LDS which is under site and you have to search again for the address. 
All state no violation after review. Under building enter the address to get info - FX County approved this monstrosity!  And the estimated cost of work is only $200,000 which includes demolishing the 4bd/2 bath section house kitchen and putting one in the tower.

Schools are Rocky Run/Chantilly so if I was the neighbor I'd sell and buy in a strong HOA. If you read FX County zoning it appears this never should have been approved and the 4210 Marble owner should have then gone to BZA-Board of zoning appeals because on p 359 of this 
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/planning-development/sites/planning-development/files/assets/documents/zmod/zmod-adopted-ordinance-footnotes.pdf

4. The total gross floor area resulting from an addition to an existing single-family 
detached dwelling may be up to [b]150 percent of the total gross floor area of the 
dwelling that existed at the time of the first expansion request.  Thing was 2028 so the addition could be 3042 for total structure size 5070. Plumbing adds 6 toilets, 8 sinks, 6 showers, W/D and estimated cost of work by a plumber is on ly $7000[/b]

5. The BZA determines that the proposed addition is in character with the 
existing on-site development in terms of the location, height, bulk, and scale of 
the existing structure(s) on the lot. 
6. The BZA determines that the location, height, bulk, and scale of the proposed 
addition is harmonious with the surrounding off-site uses and structures, and 
its development preserves existing vegetation and significant trees, as 
determined by the Director, characteristic of surrounding off-site uses and 
structures. 
[b]8. The BZA determines that the proposed addition will not adversely impact the 
use and enjoyment of any adjacent property with regard to issues such as 
noise, light, air, safety, erosion, and stormwater runoff. [/b]

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics