Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "OMB trying to change guidance to no back pay "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“ Essential” who are working should 100% get paid - there should be a rainy day fund for this. Examples include active military and others deemed “dangerous essential”. Not right to pay for work performed in any book. However, those furloughed should not receive back pay. Yes..not their fault govt ran out of money but how is this different from a private employee who lays off employees for the same reason? We assume the loss of employment -why do Feds feel entitled to pay if their employee has no $$ to make payroll. [/quote] We have had these shutdowns and near shutdowns since the 90s. The promise to pay furloughed employees is simply a cheap recruitment tool. Many fed employees are from a LMC or working glass background — the attraction of Fed work was stability, and huge gaps in your salary is pretty antithetical to that. Now that stability has been tossed out the window with DOGE, not paying furlough will be the final nail in coffin for future employees, but maybe it’s fine because they will privatize almost everything?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics