Reply to Auburn vs Alabama

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Auburn vs Alabama"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do the smarter kids go to Auburn in Alabama like the best kids in VA go to UVA? If admitted to both Auburn has a much better ranking and the academic profile is superior.[/quote]

7th generation Alabamian here. My recent observation is that as the U of Alabama has aggressively pursued out of state students, football glory and "Bama Rush" Internet exposure, Auburn has increasingly become the school of choice for both talented in state kids and the state's social elite. Dare I say it, Bama is becoming considered a bit "tacky" by the old line Southerners.

More kids from Mountain Brook in Birmingham go to Auburn these days than Alabama (if they stay in state at all). A similar pattern holds for other top public systems and the top private schools statewide (Indian Springs, Altamont, Randolph, St. Paul's Episcopal in Mobile etc.).  This is quite a reversal from the historical practice, when the state's elite primarily went to the "Capstone" while looking down on the barners attending that cow college on the other side of the state.  The higher quality kids in-state, both socially and academically, mostly say "War Eagle" these days.[/quote]

I believe you, pp.

But I’ll offer another perspective as a bleeding heart liberal from a very blue state whose kid opted for Bama.

In terms of my credentials, I know a lot of wealthy and connected people from Alabama (who still reside there) as well as similarly situated people in both northern and slither states, including people with insight into Bama’s business model.

They are aggressively pursuing bright and affluent students from blue states to increase their stats and clout outside of the state. Simply put: the school’s reputation won’t improve to the level they aspire if they continue to cater to Alabamians.

I believe the school’s reputation won’t will rise in the rankings because their business model has already begun to attract smart kids from rich families.

Regardless, Auburn has the better reputation for now…but that probably has something to do with the fact that many northerners have no clue that Auburn is in Al. [/quote]

DP this is accurate. However, one could reasonably ask why a state university is trying to increase its national reputation. Bama exists to educate Alabamians, and if Alabamians are now leaning towards Auburn, then Bama needs to reconsider its strategy. Because let’s be honest, Bama is never going to compete with UVA, UNC and even UGA nationally. [/quote]

It might. They are bringing in tons of new money, and recruiting outside the state is smart…and what virtually every successful flagship has done.

UNC is really a unicorn in terms of prioritizing in/state students. [/quote]

How many of those top kids would go to Bama if it wasn’t very heavily discounted, if not free? The demand of OOS kids willing to pay OOS tuition is the true litmus test in my opinion. [/quote]

[b]TONS of OOS kids are paying full tuition. TONS. [/b]

And the wealth on that campus is ridiculous…and I say that as an affluent person living in an affluent area up north. I’m shocked by the public display of wealth (think: cars, jewelry, clothing, shoes, vacations, etc.).

There are students with parents who own or fly private planes to/from the area. If I can point to a handful, surely there must be more.

It’s like the school is actually making fetch happen. And everyone knows success breeds success.

[/quote]

Cite?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics