Reply to DOJ, RIP

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "DOJ, RIP"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I suspect what that leaves us with is: “I don’t like the policy goal” of the agreement.[/quote]
There should be no political “policy goal” of a legal agreement. A few PPs above compared this to, say, giving immunity to a cooperating witness, which is not relevant because if that witness helps convict another defendant that serves the public interest and that of justice. That’s very different than a “policy goal.”[/quote]

Woah, woah, woah. Are you meaning to  suggest that enforcing the immigration laws of this country does not serve the public interest and justice?

Because they what the deal seems to have been. [/quote]

Oh ok so you would have been ok with Biden telling the DOJ to dismiss Hunter's charges because he needs Hunter's experience in Ukraine to negotiate peace?[/quote]
Or someone saying that Jeffrey Epstein was such an important financier with so much dirt on important people that he couldn’t possibly face justice? [/quote]

PP. No, that’s not a good analogy. The Epstein case was helping people hide crimes. [b]Hard to argue the benefit of the exchange accrues to the state in that case. [/b]

The deal with Adams appears to be help from Adams in ENFORCING existing federal laws. Not sidestepping them. So I don’t think this comparison is quite right. [/quote]
Depends on who’s committing the crimes and whether they’re  in charge of the state.

If DHS’s policy goals in New York State are legal, then they don’t need to put a noose around the Mayor’s neck to enforce them.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics