Reply to DOJ, RIP

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "DOJ, RIP"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I suspect what that leaves us with is: “I don’t like the policy goal” of the agreement.[/quote]
There should be no political “policy goal” of a legal agreement. A few PPs above compared this to, say, giving immunity to a cooperating witness, which is not relevant because if that witness helps convict another defendant that serves the public interest and that of justice. That’s very different than a “policy goal.”[/quote]

Woah, woah, woah. Are you meaning to  suggest that enforcing the immigration laws of this country does not serve the public interest and justice?

Because they what the deal seems to have been. [/quote]

Oh ok so you would have been ok with Biden telling the DOJ to dismiss Hunter's charges because he needs Hunter's experience in Ukraine to negotiate peace?[/quote]
Or someone saying that Jeffrey Epstein was such an important financier with so much dirt on important people that he couldn’t possibly face justice? [/quote]

PP. No, that’s not a good analogy. The Epstein case was helping people hide crimes. Hard to argue the benefit of the exchange accrues to the state in that case.

The deal with Adams appears to be help from Adams in ENFORCING existing federal laws. Not sidestepping them. So I don’t think this comparison is quite right. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics