Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Why do teachers allow horribly behaved kids to stay in the classroom and disrupt other kids? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not the teachers, but school administration. Schools should have a room turned into a cell. Poor behaving kids placed inside, paddy-wagon comes by and picks them up and off to juvenile detention. Oh wait that’s not equitable, never mind. [/quote] Yes, that certainly sounds like a thoughtful plan and helpful rhetoric. It's incredible there isn't more trust, confidence, and support for reform with great ideas like that getting flung around.[/quote] Please read the post of this kind of mom^^ - from the locked thread linked to below. Anonymous wrote: OP’s kid is a snitch. Give me a chair thrower any day. As it happens one of ours was very intense in pre-K and ES. No chair throwing necessarily, but he had a lot of challenges, outbursts, and beat the hell out of a few kids over the years. (Normal ES fights, no permanent damage… for those of you scandalized by a little boys being boys.) Anyway, we’re very rich, and dedicated, got him all the right doctors and meds and therapists (took a ton of effort). And now he’s absolutely THRIVING… has always been 99th percentile academically and is now harnessing that even more, he’s well-liked, happy, works hard, has a lot of friends. Top of his class and has a great life ahead of him. The point? Reducing a 6 or 7 year old child to “a chair thrower” is a pathetic, weak ass, limp noodle, bullying tactic… suggests to me a parent with no integrity, likely just looking for space to feel better about the mediocre bag of milk you’ve raised. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/735/1154228.page Many parents with significant means - not just parents in hardscrabble circumstances - truly in their hearts do not give a fk on any level about the damage their kids do to other kids. They are sociopaths raising sociopaths, and different laws like IDEA preclude schools from setting consequences that can be construed as penalizing kids who attack and ‘beat the hell out of’ others. I’m in a similar economic stratum and I see this all the time. People with all the power in the world - according to them! - who twist words and life beyond coherence, where parents objecting to things that hurt their kids are ‘bullying’ abusive kids and their selfish parents. Parents of violent kids do not see themselves as living in a community, at all. They have no concerns for the victims of their kids, including the teachers. It is what it is.[/quote] OK, but with that attitude, you must realize you're going to pick up a lot of enemies and detractors. And that that will ultimately limit your ability to successfully lobby for change. [/quote] How cinematic, concerned mamabear. I’m not worried about ‘enemies,’ I’m worried about kids who are, to keep this on topic, horribly behaved per the OP, impacted kids who are appropriately mainstreamed with GenEd and who have parents who actually parent. Why don’t you work on that and give your monitoring of these threads a little break, sweetheart? Kids with SN is that way. [/quote] The weird thing is that we should have the same goal- making things better for all students. But you're obviously more interested in hurting kids with special needs. And your hatred of them has blinded you from looking at anything else.[/quote] Oh gosh. That IS weird! It is absolutely the primary goal, to harm poor Mason and violate his IEP, is that what you think I wrote? Would you mind directly quoting that? The issue at hand is how to deal with instances of physical violence and sustained periods of interruption to classroom instruction for the majority - how to keep parents aware, how to support teachers, and how to support learning for all. I’ve become interested and invested after my child’s inclusion room was tasked with integrating a child who has repeated grades and lives a portion of his young life in the principals office because he physically attacks students, and there is no ISS. Neither I nor anyone else to my knowledge has inquired about any SNs or asserted that those are our right to know — so what in the actual fk are you on about, lady? When I’ve searched for this topic on DCUM your responses come up over years. This is how you support your child? By insisting that other parents are at fault? How telling.[/quote] That is exactly my point. You want to expel/suspend first, ask questions later. You're not interested in identifying the supports and services that these kids need, nor are you interested in demanding that schools have the resources to provide those. Ordinary I would stay this isn't parents' fault, it is MCPS's fault. But your post suggests a much higher level of culpability.[/quote] Insulting people is not going to work. Cancel culture is dead - an election was just won/lost because people want problems fixed and they don’t want to be cancelled anymore for stating facts. We’re not going to put any more money as country into trying to mainstream kids who clearly can’t handle that just because their parents are delusional or entitled and don’t want their kid in a facility that is built to handle them. So you can just stop complaining that you’re not getting more money.[/quote] And you can just stop complaining that you're not going going to get to warehouse kids with special needs or expel them when they're hard to accomodate.[/quote] Quit with the hyperbole. All your talk of “warehousing” kids is over the top and frankly annoying. Representing yourself in such an unlikable way is not going to help your cause. And I’ll say let’s see what happens about things changing. My guess is that the tide is turning and we’ll start to see a return to some semblance of sanity in the schools over the next couple of years. It will just take one or two brave representatives to start the ball rolling, and then the dam will burst very quickly. The vast majority of people in this country want violent and excessively disruptive kids out of mainstream classrooms. It’s a no brainer. Advocating publicly for leaving things how they are would be political suicide.[/quote] Violent kids are not being removed from classes because there are no places to send them. The schools that are developed for these kids are expensive, small ratios and specialized rooms/equipment. FCPS, and other counties, do not have the facilities or the money to build/develop the facilities for these kids. Admin is gatekeeping because there is no place to send the kids. And because the reports that show that kids with IEPs are far more likely to be suspended or expelled then kids without IEPs. The numbers are even worse when you include URM with IEPs. The optic is awful and the solution is expensive. There are kids who have been identified as needing placement who are at home waiting for a spot. The private schools are full and a good number of the private schools for the most disruptive kids are pretty much warehouses. The descriptions of the schools are pretty dire. Most of the private schools that people know about, like McLean, are expensive and will not take physically disruptive kids. A good number of the private SPED schools that people mention will not take kids diagnosed with Autism. The schools are for kids with ADHD and/or LDs. So while the no brainer solution for everyone is to remove the kid from the classroom, there is no place for those kids to go. the State is obligated to provide an education to every child. The situation would be a bit different if the Federal Government actually funded the programs at the level that they are supposed to but it doesn’t. I do suspect that there are kids who do not have a medical or mental issue that is leading to their behavior but there are parenting issues at home. Those kids parents are probably ignoring the schools calls and actions and would fight their kid being placed in any special program. The kids with serious mental/health issues that need services have parents who are fighting tooth and nail for services because they know that early intervention will help their kid greatly. While I know some parents of kids with SPED issues whose heads are buried in the sand, most of the parents I know want as much help for their kid, to include smaller classrooms and more supports in the classroom. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics