Reply to 40% of women under 30 voted for Trump

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "40% of women under 30 voted for Trump"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women’s sports, bathrooms as safe spaces for women and crime in the stores and streets affect women more than men.

Also, young women have brains and are also concerned about national issues like the economy and illegal immigration. 
[/quote]

I voted for Harris, but if it hadn’t been for Jan 6, I would have voted for Trump because of these issues. 
[/quote]
Competing against biological males in sports is more concerning to you than possibly being denied appropriate medical care during/after a miscarriage? Only one of those two things can kill you and leave any older children of yours without a mother. The number of women who want or need to terminate a pregnancy is far higher than the number of biological female athletes competing against transgender women.[/quote]

All states, every single one, allow for miscarriage care and abortions when needed in medical emergencies to save the mother, so stop with the misinformation.[/quote]

Tell that to the women who died from sepsis because their unviable fetus still had a heartbeat[/quote]

Cases of medical malpractice even for pregnant women existed prior to the overturn of Roe Vs Wade. We will always have to handle cases of malpractice - it’s a leading cause of death in the US.  But again, treatment of miscarriages has always been allowed and that won’t change, neither will a mother’s ability to get an abortion to save her life.[/quote]
There’s the law as it’s intended in theory and then there’s the law as it is actually applied in real life circumstances. You can write these cases off as malpractice, but these bans incentivize malpractice over intervening when a pregnant woman’s health goes south. Some women have already died because of the type of callous disregard you’re exhibiting in this thread. Accepting more malpractice, incentivized by the law, is not pro life.[/quote]

No one accepts malpractice. We all want these cases to result in consequences for the doctors that make terrible calls. That’s true for pregnancy care as well as all the other forms of medical malpractice that exist. It’s idiotic to suggest that someone “accepts” doctor error.[/quote]
The family members of some of these women, who were with them at the hospital, say that doctors said they couldn’t intervene.

If in a few years, when we have the data, there’s been a significant uptick in deaths of pregnant women due to sepsis in states with abortion bans, but no increase in sepsis deaths for any other population, will you admit you were wrong?[/quote]

That was not in the pro publica reports. Regardless, those family members can start a malpractice lawsuit just like any other family member who has experienced medical error. And no, there has been no significant uptick. You’re pulling that out of your butt.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics