Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "MCPS High School Magnet Decisions "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Typically, kids with high MAP-R have decent (if not great) MAP-M. MAP-R is a hard test. Kids that are really into Math (and yes, prep), can get really high MAP-M scores. It is really hard to prep for MAP-R; its a function of comprehension and reading habits developed over years. Bunch of text out there describing this phenomenon. So if RMIB is looking at MAP-R specifically, it does make sense given the holistic nature of the program. Its also a good indicator that the kids have high probability of having good enough MAP-M to be successful in STEM based portion of IB as well.[/quote] Do you have any links about this phenomenon? I find this very interesting. My daughter went from 7th grade fall map r of 253, winter 257, and spring 261. And then in fall of 8th, she dropped back to 252. In winter of 8th, she got a 247. She never did prepare for it but I don't understand how she could have had such a huge comprehension decrease like that. [/quote] You are referring to changes in MAP-R score. I am trying to justify why RMIB may only be using that for admissions and not getting MAP-M scores. They appear to be relying on the high correlation between MAP-R and MAP-M for high performing students. Ofcourse, it seems the basic assumption that RMIB evaluators did not see the MAP-M appears to be in question. BUT in the interest of sharing what little I know - I will provide some references for studies that show that kids that do well on ELA tests, typically do fine on Math. I will just list 2 (you can find many through google searching - "is reading score a good predictor for math outcomes") https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7725923/#:~:text=Specifically%2C%20average%20and%20high%20levels,average%20performing%20children%20in%20math. "Specifically, average and high levels of reading performance were associated with subsequent gains in math growth, in particular for below average performing children in math." https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED569120.pdf "This study finds that a reading screening assessment used to identify students who may be at risk of low reading achievement can predict end-of-year math outcomes with a level of accuracy similar to that of math screening assessments"[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics