Reply to Are antivaxxers all just contrarians and conspiracy theorists?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Are antivaxxers all just contrarians and conspiracy theorists?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]April 30, 2021 Salk Institute for Biological Studies

https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/

I found this interesting and simultaneously perplexing. [/quote]

Spike protein damages the vascular system, heart, lungs and brain. [/quote]

All the more reason to try to avoid a severe case of COVID. 
[/quote]

Turning your cells into spike protein factories on purpose multiple times is mental midget territory. And then get covid anyway and make your mountain of spike protein into Mt Everest [/quote]

Agree with your above statement. Was waiting for someone to illuminate the forum and this is the reason I posted.  The article is from a highly prestigious institute.  Glad someone figured out why I said “I found this interesting and simultaneously perplexing.” I was being facetious.  
[/quote]

Why are you relying on science from two and a half years ago? WTAF
[/quote]

Hmmm, weird question… a question that doesn’t discredit the science mine you.[/quote]

You know that the Salk Institute has come out saying that these vaccines are safe, that the spike protein in the vaccines is different, and that the vaccine protects against spike-protein induced endothelial injury by the virus, right?

(Right?)[/quote]

Ok, so what… a controlled exposure (vax) vs uncontrolled (community acquired).  Unhealthy people may have benefit from VAX.  My point is that perfectly healthy, younger adults (and children), don’t need it. Risk reward profile is just not there…. It’s simple math.

Package insert warnings and precautions indicate cardiovascular risk. Salk article I referenced is the reason. [/quote]

So you do or don't believe the research at the Salk Institute? Because that was actually in the article you linked.

Did you not even read the article?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics