Reply to College Football--Big Ten Expansion

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "College Football--Big Ten Expansion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No one is alleging that the former Big Ten Commission lacked authority to negotiate on behalf on the Big Ten Conference.

College coaches complain, but they typically have little to no say in this type of negotiation.

University presidents and/or university athletic directors gave the Big Ten Commissioner the authority to negotiate on their behalf.

Again, no party has made any allegation of fraud or even displeasure to the extent of regret over the contract terms.

[b]The deal is done[/b] even though secondary details need to be worked out.

[/quote]

"[b]These deals aren't done[/b], and they aren't what they were represented to be from the standpoint of the NBC deal and the availability of all members to participate in November games in primetime," said an industry source.

Interviews with nearly a dozen sources in and around the Big Ten and the college sports industry paint a picture of Petitti sprinting to navigate details left unresolved from his predecessor.

As a result, there's a trail of unhappy athletic directors seeing money disappearing from their bottom line, frustrated television executives and big-name coaches irked about the lack of transparency in details that weren't communicated to them.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_...-coaches-uncertainty[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics