Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "DC Begins School Boundary Study"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It just seems like Shepherd to Wells/Coolidge is the most obvious and needed change, but I would bet it's not going to happen. [/quote] And why should it? As long as DCPS refuses to guarantee an appropriate curriculum in MS and HS for the college-bound, parents will correctly fight to stay in the school that already provides it. [/quote] I am genuinely asking, is the curriculum that different or is the student population just different? And if the curriculum is different is it because of the student population (I.e. fewer advanced/AP classes because lower demand)? [/quote] I mean, where did you go to college yourself? I’m guessing you, like most, aimed for the highest academic cohort where you could be accepted. Even if you chose a community college or state college for financial reasons, you likely expected to be in classes taught to a high level. I’m not sure why people seem to understand and accept this for college, but are confused about how this plays out in HS.[/quote] I am wondering whether the curriculum would (or could) advance with the addition of more high-performing students. But I guess schools like Coolidge are currently stuck in a loop of high-performing students not wanting to attend because the curriculum doesn't serve them, so as a result the curriculum remains geared towards low performers. [/quote] That's part of it. But having a group of high-performing students is also not a sufficient condition for having a curriculum geared toward them. The advanced curricula and differentiation at existing DC middle and high schools got grandfathered in, more or less. It's harder to kill programs that have existing constituencies than it is to resist creating them in the first place. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics