Reply to Jessa Duggar had an abortion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Jessa Duggar had an abortion "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The most insane part of this ridiculous thread:
Conservatives trying to use semantics to convince people that a D&C isn’t an “abortion” 😂

We live in the worst time line. 
[/quote]

I’m pro-choice, and I had a miscarriage with a D&C, and I wouldn’t go and say that I had an abortion (even though that is the medical term). The accepted connotation of “abortion” is voluntarily ending a pregnancy. [/quote]

Precision of terminology is important. If the term abortion is fully understood in its medical definition then sweeping abortion bans would have to be rewritten. But GOP doesn’t want that.  They like the fear that the imprecision brings along because it makes the law even stricter than what they claim it is. Your procedure was legal, but there are extremists put there who would want to make it illegal.

And if we stopped demonizing the word abortion it wouldn’t matter to people what medical records say. [/quote]

Yes, let’s just kill the unborn and call it “health care.” [/quote]

The "unborn" don't even have souls. What's your problem with a woman removing these soulless creatures from their bodies? [/quote]

How do you know unborn babies don’t have souls? Do you have a link to a confirmation via a scientific test? Post it.

Why is “unborn” in quotes? Are we not discussing unborn humans? Are you suggesting they are not unborn? [/quote]
No they’re fetuses. Fetuses about whom you don’t care except for forcing women to birth them. You don’t like prenatal care, you think socialized healthcare is the devil, teaching critical thinking is “grooming” kids but that child marriage is a good idea, you think any kind of safety regulation is contrary to God’s law and that guns should be everywhere up to and including on a kindergarten teacher’s back.

You are a forced birther, hostile to life and progress. You do the work of the Devil and say it’s for the Lord. [/quote]

Whoa! Do the work of the Devil? Are you experiencing a mental health episode? Are you telling me “the DEVIL” is involved in abortion?[/quote]

No, they’re quite clearly comparing withholding abortions/medical care from women is bad/evil/the work of the devil, while pretending to be good and doing god’s work. Not just doing god’s work, but speaking for god and saying you know God’s will. Where I grew up, that was called being a false prophet, if I remember correctly. I’m pretty sure that’s a big, bad sin.

Not that I want to base my government on evangelical Christian teachings, but if I were going to do that I’d probably go with the kindness and loving teachings of Jesus rather than the fire and brimstone god who smote people who made him angry. I’d say you do you, but unfortunately you’re trying to do it to everyone, so I’ll go with WWJD, and J would probably be pretty chill about this situation. He seems pro healthcare. Also, as a Jew, I don’t think he’d be opposed to abortions, especially first trimester or for medical reasons discovered later. He probably wouldn’t be as chill about using abortion as a wedge issue to try to keep schools segregated legally (look it up, that’s why evangelical churches got involved in the politics of abortions) and doing evil things like racism and causing women harm in his name. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics