Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Are they going after Obergefell v. Hodges?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would this would apply to all couples who used donor eggs or sperm, not just same sex. [/quote] What did the sperm bank contract say? I thought sperm and/or egg donors waived parental rights? How would that be any different than a parent that gives their kid up for adoption waiving their rights? [/quote] If you read the story, the birth mother is with the sperm donor now. This seems like an old fashioned donation and not a sperm bank. [/quote] +1 After reading the article, it's pretty clear that this isn't a "sperm donation".[/quote] Doesn’t matter. If she’d been married to another man and had an affair, then listed the husband on the birth certificate, had him raise the child for 2 years, he’d have rights. [/quote] … had an affair and then married the bio dad. This case is a little complicated. Not saying it isn’t troubling, but when I first clicked, I thought some random sperm donor took custody from a nice lesbian couple. This isn’t that. This is messy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics