Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Charge of Seditious Conspiracy 1/6"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Oops [twitter]https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1577887661217484804?s=46&t=AN1qqvnwhVcgQXZRzBLasA[/twitter][/quote] The judge said it was too prejudicial. [/quote] How is it “too prejudicial” to show what they were planning? So weird. [/quote] I don't get this. Judges are allowed to withhold a KEY piece of incriminating evidence? Whose side is the judge on?[/quote] He wasn’t charged with trying to kill election workers. Evidence has to be relevant to the charged crime, and evidence that is only tangentially relevant can be excluded if it is too prejudicial. Those are the rules of evidence.[/quote] It’s debatable IMO because he said he only wanted to kill Antifa, and election workers are definitely not Antifa.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
