Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bannon indicted"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guilty on both count![/quote] Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency. I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated. For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.[/quote] "iTS a KAngArOO CoURT ThEy wONt LeT TrUMpS SiDE bE HEaRD!!!!1!!1!" I saw that from at least a dozen different MAGA idiots on Twitter. "Won't allow any defense?" "Wouldn't let him testify?" They asked for Trump's side to testify. Trump, Meadows, Bannon and others refused. So then they sent subpoenas - which are being fought in court. Trump, Meadows, Bannon have had EVERY opportunity to come forward and tell their side of the story. It's THEY who have refused, it's THEY who are hiding from the truth.[/quote] So they can prosecute them all one by one. Let's see how that pans out.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics