Reply to Bannon indicted

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bannon indicted"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guilty on both count![/quote]

Of course! That's what happens when you aren't allowed to mount a defense. SC should overturn it as there's precedence from way back during Nixon's presidency.

I don't like Bannon but I don't like kangaroo courts more. We have to be VERY careful or it will come back to bite us as a party. This makes me very nervous. Bannon is not easily intimidated.

For those speaking about Hillary, she walked into a much friendlier situation.[/quote]

1. Bannon was in front of Carl Nichols do you not know who he is? MR MAGA to you!
2. Bannon had a very fair trial he literally decided on his own not to go on the stand and defend himself so where the Hell do you get he was not allowed to mount a defense? He was 100% allowed to Judge Nichols asked him many times. FACTS
3. Everyone can read the trial transcript this is not hard.
4. The only kangaroo court was Judge Nichols's instructions to the jury which were quite favorable to Bannon. 
5. Bannon didn't talk for a reason and we all know why.
6. He will appeal and 99% won't get an appeal but if he gets a MAGA judge again possibly who knows but our laws say the judge and the jury found him guility currently. FACT.

You are a liar MAGA [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics