Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "What’s in the water in Chicagoland? (Univ. of Chicago & Northwestern)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]UChicago has been a sought after school since the 70’s.[/quote] This is simply not true. UChicago has always been a respected name in academia, but certainly not a “sought out” school. Northwestern, on the other hand, has always been fairly prestigious and popular among applicants, and has a long roster of significant alumni throughout its history to back it up. Both schools have ramped up in popularity in recent decades.[/quote] Says someone who has no idea what they’re talking about. UChicago has been “sought out” by kids who want a serious, intense academic experience. And in terms of significant alumni throughout its history: the number of Nobel laureates who went to UChicago is practically unparalleled, so I’m not sure why you’re acting like Northwestern has a more impressive alumni roster. [/quote] I'm saying "sought out" in the sense that most people thinking about college are talking about: undergraduate applicants. In this regard, Chicago has made extremely noticeable strides. A couple of decades, it simply wasn't a destination for undergrads in the way that it is now. I already said that it was well regarded in academia, so there's no argument there. I don't think it's controversial at all to say that historically, Northwestern was much more of a "destination" for undergrad applicants, and its alumni reflect that: fewer notable alumni in academia, but noticeably more alumni that would be familiar names to laypeople. Don't get me wrong, they're both excellent institutions, just very different in approach and character, and in turn the types of alumni they've historically produced. Don't worry, I'm not sh*tting on UChicago, I think it's a great school. Same with Northwestern.[/quote] It wasn’t a destination for your average suburban kid, sure. Until they started accepting the Common App, that is, and those kids started taking notice. And maybe Northwestern has more alumni who are household names, but is that really a mark of success for a university? Should they be in the business of producing celebrities? Honestly, I think UChicago should’ve stayed the way they were before — producing absolutely excellent alumni, not only in academia, but across journalism, the arts, etc. and not trying to appeal to every random kid. Most UChicago alums agree with me. We think our university has lost what made it special. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics