Reply to What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "What are your honest opinions of Camilla Parker Bowles today in 2022 ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"And when, in the fullness of time, my son Charles becomes King, I know you will give him and his wife Camilla the same support that you have given me; and it is my sincere wish that, when that time comes, Camilla will be known as Queen Consort as she continues her own loyal service."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/05/uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-platinum-jubilee-accession-day-gbr-intl/index.html[/quote]

Diana would have been gutted. She would be in her third or or fourth marriage to a middle eastern cokehead and Camilla will be Queen consort.   [/quote]

Camilla the mistress would have never married Charles - Diana would have made sure of it. The fact that he had to wait a further 8 years after her death to be able to marry a woman he'd been tipping since the 70s proves it.

Diana would have been living a glamorous life in New York City and in London just like Jackie Onassis. Charles was being out-maneuvered legally and publicly which is why he gave her $18 million in the divorce and then she was dead a year later.[/quote]

Jackie Onassis is a terrible example to use. Hardly inspiring.

Diana's problem was that she was still mother of the future king. Her popularity would have depended entirely on how she behaved, and in her last year there was plenty of public disapproval of her running around with Dodi Fayed. A sympathetic British commented to me that it was a blessing Diana died when she died because her life was only getting messier. Realistically, she should have tried to find happiness with a stable and solid man and quietly retreated to a quiet life somewhere. But she couldn't give up the cameras and paparazzi (parallels with Meghan Markle, when you think about it). It's intriguing how Camilla has a very different relationship with the press despite they being much more hostile to her for a long time. She knew how to handle the press while preserving her own privacy, something Diana never could (and ditto for Meghan Markle).

[/quote]

You think people 'approved' of Jackie marrying a 60-year-old reclusive Greek shipping magnate? Nope. She just didn't care. She wanted to get out of the U.S. and access to billions which would provide for her and her children. And she did.

That's the reason Diana pursued Fayed. She was British by birth - there was nowhere to [i]retreat[/i]. Her own brother turned her away, the aristos sided with Charles and his mistress, and it was an island where everyone was in her business. There's a reason aristos who have affairs flee overseas. They have no support.

And Camilla has no privacy to preserve. Her phone sex tapes with Charles were already public and her antics as well as the aristo homes they were having sexual escapades in all up-and-down England were all well-known. She'd hit bottom - as long as she and Charles sold out whoever and gave the press a bit of a tipsy dance with the future 'Princess Consort' - she went up in their esteem.

*Camilla literally hand-in-hand in the arms of the tabloids (the lead photographer of the Sun)*
[img]https://www.newsletter.co.uk/images-o.jpimedia.uk/imagefetch/http://www.newsletter.co.uk/webimage/Prestige.Item.1.91678957!image/image.jpg?width=640&enable=upscale[/img][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics