Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't understand why this isn't viewed as a first amendment separation of church and state issue.  Life begins at conception is a religious-based belief, isn't it? If you don't believe that, then why should the state be able to require you adhere to a religious belief you don't accept?[/quote]

No one is seeking to tie viability to conception.  That is hyperbole.  Viability begins at about 24 weeks.  That is when premies can survive.  [/quote]

Actually the pro-life movement believes that life begins at conception. This is why they also oppose all hormonal based forms of contraception (pill, patch, ring and norplant and depoprovera) plus IUDs because they believe those forms of contraception interfere with implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus and therefore are abortion-causers.

Life begins at conception is literally the fundamental belief of the pro-life movement. All their attempts at laws that restrict abortion are efforts to move the line on abortion incrementally back closer to conception 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics