Reply to Sexless-ness is an acceptable negative outcome from marriage

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Sexless-ness is an acceptable negative outcome from marriage"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If my DH becomes impotent he should expect cheating or divorce? [/quote]

I specifically used the term "physical intimacy", not "sexual intercourse".  There are plenty of ways to share physical intimacy without makin' babies.  [/quote]

But what if I want p-in-v sex? Is everyone who says it's acceptable to cheat on your wife also going to support that despite his inability to perform I'm entitled to have sex with a man who can get hard? Or simply divorce?[/quote]

A partner who physically has certain limits but is otherwise ready/willing/able to work with you, yet the other partner INSISTS the ONE SPECIFIC definition of "sex" that their partner cannot offer.
[b]You've just created a straw man scenario that describes probably 0.00001% of sexless marriages. Well done!!
[/b]
[/quote]

Can you provide a citation for this stat? Despite popular belief, the existence of a vagina doesn't mean it's wet or that there's physical ability. Sex is painful when your vagina isn't into this. But of course, we understand when a man isn't physically able, but when women aren't we try to convince them to just shove it in. [/quote]

Well all of the sexless marriage scenarios on here are that a) husband is an asshole/bad partner/etc and wife (duh!) does not want sex with an a-hole   b) husband may be a fine partner but wife just does not want/need sex

In other words, the issue has nothing to do with any performance limitations.  It's all about lack of interest/willingness for reason A or B or both.[/quote]

So you have no proof of the stat you claimed [/quote]

Scroll to the top and use the "Search this forum" feature to find cases of sexless marriage. Find me a single one even close to your straw man scenario and I will concede your victory.[/quote]

You already proved me right with point B. Not wanting sex = it's painful to just "shove it in". Your inability to get that is why no one will have sex with you. If you can't get a woman wet, it means it's bad sex. No, wetness is not something we can turn on and off willingly. [/quote]

I'm not sure why you're stuck on your cis heteronormative framing of this issue.  This problem can exist with male/male and female/female partners just as well as it can with male/female.[/quote]Because that's how most of us talk.  We don't need to bend to your requirement to be inclusive of every possible relationship partnering.  Most people don't go around using made up terms like, Cis, or heteronormative.  You sound like an idiot when you talk like that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics