Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Sexless-ness is an acceptable negative outcome from marriage"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If my DH becomes impotent he should expect cheating or divorce? [/quote] I specifically used the term "physical intimacy", not "sexual intercourse". There are plenty of ways to share physical intimacy without makin' babies. [/quote] But what if I want p-in-v sex? Is everyone who says it's acceptable to cheat on your wife also going to support that despite his inability to perform I'm entitled to have sex with a man who can get hard? Or simply divorce?[/quote] A partner who physically has certain limits but is otherwise ready/willing/able to work with you, yet the other partner INSISTS the ONE SPECIFIC definition of "sex" that their partner cannot offer. [b]You've just created a straw man scenario that describes probably 0.00001% of sexless marriages. Well done!! [/b] [/quote] Can you provide a citation for this stat? Despite popular belief, the existence of a vagina doesn't mean it's wet or that there's physical ability. Sex is painful when your vagina isn't into this. But of course, we understand when a man isn't physically able, but when women aren't we try to convince them to just shove it in. [/quote] Well all of the sexless marriage scenarios on here are that a) husband is an asshole/bad partner/etc and wife (duh!) does not want sex with an a-hole b) husband may be a fine partner but wife just does not want/need sex In other words, the issue has nothing to do with any performance limitations. It's all about lack of interest/willingness for reason A or B or both.[/quote] So you have no proof of the stat you claimed [/quote] Scroll to the top and use the "Search this forum" feature to find cases of sexless marriage. Find me a single one even close to your straw man scenario and I will concede your victory.[/quote] You already proved me right with point B. Not wanting sex = it's painful to just "shove it in". Your inability to get that is why no one will have sex with you. If you can't get a woman wet, it means it's bad sex. No, wetness is not something we can turn on and off willingly. [/quote] I'm not sure why you're stuck on your cis heteronormative framing of this issue. This problem can exist with male/male and female/female partners just as well as it can with male/female.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics