Reply to Arlington GA

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Arlington GA"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can you provide more info? What do you mean by FCV lost the non GA teams? FCV is fielding non GA girls teams next year![/quote]

And now girls can play HS so there’s that!

Incoming state champions this spring unless powers that be force additional house-arrests with another virus scam

(I believe ECNL doesn’t allow clubs within a very short radius to be in their league so if McLean already was in the league Arlington will never be allowed to join unless the former leave or are kicked - which won’t happen) [/quote]

Specially if that club is built on recruiting players from the next door club. It will never happen![/quote]

Who cares.  We don't need it.[/quote]

Really? I'm Arlington and I have huge concerns over GA beyond next year. I personally hope that Arlington can figure out a way to get ECNL for the girls because I think GA will gradually become weaker each year. I hope I'm wrong.[/quote]

That's one view, but the reality is that no one knows.  In this area, the GA is in general stronger and the GA mid atlantic is a good place to be from a competition and geographical range standpoint.   Arlington doesn't need ECNL.[/quote]

Blah, Blah, Blah!  It sounds like sour grapes.   Why did Arlington apply to ECNL if GA Mid Atlantic division is stronger?   Arlington's actions speak louder than your words. [/quote]

Everyone applied to ECNL to cover their bases. GA seemed to do a pretty good job putting a league together under very trying circumstances.

Imagine ECNL letting all those clubs walk. Which is harder, adding clubs into an established league or starting a brand new league?

Just insane the short sightedness of ECNL. They had a golden opportunity to end it once and for all. [/quote]

ECNL took the best DA clubs.  Arlington was not one of them.  Nor was MU.     [/quote]

But BRYC and Loudoun are. LOL. OK, “The best”[/quote]

Right. [/quote]

BRYC and Loudoun were not in DA, when it fell apart.  When DA fell apart, ECNL had the pick of the litter.   Arlington and MU were not among the top DA programs.   ECNL took Arlington boys, who had a stronger program.  [/quote]

ECNL picked two bad clubs who are performing poorly. ECNL is not terribly selective sorry to break that to you.  [/quote]

This is accurate.  There’s no differentiation by club or player quality locally between the two leagues.  There are better and worse teams, across both.  Either are a step up from the alternatives, though.  [/quote]

If you compare Arlington and MU college committments with McLean or BRYC, you will see a big differentiation. [/quote]

Why did you not compare Loudoun’s?[/quote]

Loudoun is not the benchmark for ECNL commitments, but it has more college commitments for 2020 class than Arlington or MU.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics