Reply to They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???

[/quote]

The whistleblower did everything right. 
No requirement to have firsthand evidence to report concerns.
He reported concerns to the CIA General Counsel (Courtney Elwood), as he was supposed to.
CIA General Counsel found report credible and passed it on to Acting Director of National Intelligence Maguire as she was supposed to.

Maguire was supposed to pass the information on to Congress but didn't.

The whistleblower is no longer relevant. [/quote]

Except for meet with Schiff a month earlier[/quote]

With Schiff's staff, where they were told what the Whistleblower process was and who to contact. Again, does this negate the story that Rudy, Mulvaney and Trump have all admitted to and that documents, phone calls, text messages and the testimony of more than 10 people support? You keep bringing up these deflecting Fox points that are irrelevant to the core story, that the President of the United States extorted another foreign leader who was under the gun barrel of the Russians using Congressionally appropriated funds for personal gain.

Why?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics