Reply to Felicity Huffman sentencing today

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Felicity Huffman sentencing today"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Speak for yourself . Reese hasnt a bit movie in forever ,she survives because unlike huffmann she seem to have somewhat of a solid fan base in the south. Huffmann rings no bell amongst critical demogrpahics like African Americans and Latinos who are expected to be the driver of population growth tomorrow.Yeah picture a 30 something AA woman eagerly wanting to see huffmann, she was a virtue signaling liberal , therefore a no-go for the Dixie crowd. Stick a fork in it.[/quote]

IMDB disagrees with you.

She did "Sing" in 2016.  "Home Again" in 2017.  "A Wrinkle in Time" in 2018.  All of which made money (and Sing made a ton of money).  She's currently filming "Sing 2" (2021) and in pre-production for "Legally Blonde 3" (2020).  Her star may have dimmed briefly, but she's not black-listed and is still working quite a lot and in some big box office draws.[/quote]

Agreed.

And not sure why someone thinks the AA demographics is going to be the driver of tomorrow's population growth either. It's pretty constant as a share of US population since the 1970s. IT's the Latino population that has grown. [/quote]

And how many Latinos give a rat's ass ? How many of those movies were blockbusters ??? Keep talking [/quote]'

Depends on how you define blockbuster.  Sing is probably the only one that is, as it grossed $635M on a budget of $75M.

Home Again wasn't a blockbuster, but it made a good profit ($37M gross on a budget of $12M).  A Wrinkle in Time was a bit of a cult classic, because of the genre, but it still made $136M, albeit on a budget of $100K.

Sing 2 and Legally Blonde 3 are sequels to big profit margin franchises.  They are likely to make a lot of money.  Legally Blonde made $141M on an $18M budget and still made $125M on a budget of $45M, good numbers for a sequel.  Both of these sequels should make a lot of money and Sing 2 will probably be another blockbuster.

B[b]ut the point is that people are still paying a lot of money to see her [/b]and her popularity is such that she is still an A-lister star.  She has an Oscar and she is one of the highest paid actresses in Hollywood.  She has taken any hit from the incident mentioned above.[/quote]

IDK how this conversation got so Reese focused but that's a flat-out lie.

Sing was an animated special with an all-star cast. Reese was hardly a draw, I can't even remember which animal she was. Did she sing at least?

Legally Blonde 3 hasn't released yet.

Wrinkle in Time was a flop - especially with the supposed caliber of women leading the production which is why there's no sequel.

Reese is a public drunk and an embarrassment.

[img]https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/10/12/9623022-6687891-image-a-73_1549803009894.jpg[/img]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6687891/Reese-Witherspoon-Big-Little-Lies-star-Laura-Dern-enjoy-Jennifer-Anistons-50th-birthday-bash.html[/quote]

* whispering* shhh....... don't come up with facts here, the alternate reality crowd who thought it was no big deal for a woman to try to buy her intellectually deficient daughter's way to college will lash out at you.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics