Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Felicity Huffman sentencing today"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Speak for yourself . Reese hasnt a bit movie in forever ,she survives because unlike huffmann she seem to have somewhat of a solid fan base in the south. Huffmann rings no bell amongst critical demogrpahics like African Americans and Latinos who are expected to be the driver of population growth tomorrow.Yeah picture a 30 something AA woman eagerly wanting to see huffmann, she was a virtue signaling liberal , therefore a no-go for the Dixie crowd. Stick a fork in it.[/quote] IMDB disagrees with you. She did "Sing" in 2016. "Home Again" in 2017. "A Wrinkle in Time" in 2018. All of which made money (and Sing made a ton of money). She's currently filming "Sing 2" (2021) and in pre-production for "Legally Blonde 3" (2020). Her star may have dimmed briefly, but she's not black-listed and is still working quite a lot and in some big box office draws.[/quote] Agreed. And not sure why someone thinks the AA demographics is going to be the driver of tomorrow's population growth either. It's pretty constant as a share of US population since the 1970s. IT's the Latino population that has grown. [/quote] And how many Latinos give a rat's ass ? How many of those movies were blockbusters ??? Keep talking [/quote]' Depends on how you define blockbuster. Sing is probably the only one that is, as it grossed $635M on a budget of $75M. Home Again wasn't a blockbuster, but it made a good profit ($37M gross on a budget of $12M). A Wrinkle in Time was a bit of a cult classic, because of the genre, but it still made $136M, albeit on a budget of $100K. Sing 2 and Legally Blonde 3 are sequels to big profit margin franchises. They are likely to make a lot of money. Legally Blonde made $141M on an $18M budget and still made $125M on a budget of $45M, good numbers for a sequel. Both of these sequels should make a lot of money and Sing 2 will probably be another blockbuster. But the point is that people are still paying a lot of money to see her and her popularity is such that she is still an A-lister star. She has an Oscar and she is one of the highest paid actresses in Hollywood. She has taken any hit from the incident mentioned above.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics