Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Have any of you visited WL? When I went, I saw several teachers of color. In fact, some of them graduated from WL. Schools are not saviors. Learning begins and is nurtured in the home. If parents can't help their children succeed, then maybe [b]free tutoring should be offered and required for struggling students[/b]. [/quote] It isn't already available at Latin? [/quote] What kids get at Latin which they wont get at lots of other HS is very close relationships w faculty. . It's a small school. Mentoring for teenagers isi nvaluable. Curious, when the charter board does this review is is entirely based on this one test or is it more of a school review - what they're doing great at (ahem, college placement which is an actual real world result. Is it not at or near 100%???) Or is this all about the stupid PARCC? I agree, if the achievement gap must be closed latin needs to start with neonatal programming. They should look at neonatal through 4th, before they look at a second site if closing the achievement gap is the only value folks see in the school.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics