Reply to Prince Harry and Archie

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Prince Harry and Archie"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

New poster but heres the point - Meghans engagement dress, that she only wore for pics and likely will never wear again, cost $75,000. Her baby shower was extravagant, no matter who paid for it. and these are only 2 examples...

shes new, shes an outsider and instead of [u]easing[/u] into the lavish and extraordinary spending of a royal she seems to have jumped right in - whether its right or wrong, the optics look bad.  People say she was "rich" before but come on - her house in Toronto looked like a shack and if her entire net worth as a B-list actress was $5 mill that would last about 3 years in LA unless she kept working to sustain her "sayonara zara" lifestyle (which, as an aside was a tacky theme for a party).[/quote]

People are willing for forgive the dresses to some extent, especially of she tones it down over time, but they want to see pictures of the baby. If he is a totally private citizen, then they want her to seriously resculpt  / eliminate her official wardrobe spending, (is she even required to do events?) independent foundation, separate household supported by the crown, etc. The issue is that she wants to insert them as a power couple and have a foundation, with a household supported by the crown, but not tow. the royal line. Anyway, I feel like I am fighting others battles.[/quote]

You're demanding access to a baby now? Maybe have the thought that Meghan and Harry don't want Archie exposed to the press's hatred so soon, especially since he'll spend his entire life in the public eye.

No one is crying for pictures of Lena, Savannah, Isla, or Mia. And the ONLY pictures they got of Lena at her christening in March 2019 were the back of her head. I'm so sick of double standards.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D15ijmHX4AYOiyW.jpg[/img][/quote]

Who?[/quote]

Exactly.

They have the same relevancy to the royal family as Archie and no titles. Yet you don’t know who they are.[/quote]

no title = no direct access to crown estate. they can still be funded through the queens discretionary spending, which is what maintains the majority of the non working royals.

for the poster who wrote 2 residences per family.... try 12. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics