Reply to Pitt Jolie custody

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Pitt Jolie custody"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Recent news states that Pitt hasn’t paid any meaningful child support.

It seems strange that Angie would claim this because I was always under the impression that w/all her success in Hollywood + beyond...that she had a ton of money.

But supporting six children in Hollywood likely is more expensive than any of us could ever imagine.[/quote]

The kids are not in school and are raised probably by nannies.  He apparently has paid close to 2 millions in expenses and loaned her money to buy a house which makes no sense given how much money she has.[/quote]

This was debated a page ago.

The fact that she has money is moot. They are not HER children; they are THEIR children, and he still has a financial responsibility, regardless of her income. He’s not exactly destitute, himself. But you are all too clouded in the weird hate for a celebrity that you’ve never met to see that this is just like any other divorce with children. The father is responsible for the financial well-being his children to his capacity.

I’d also assume that everyone is pretty lawyered up in Hollywood, so his loan (if it’s more than an apparently) is likely contractural. It certainly can’t fall under “support” if she’s paying him back, can it? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics