Reply to The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]There are many people who believe both Clinton and Trump did things that were dishonest and should be called into question. I don't understand why people miss this important fact. Not liking one person's actions does not by default, make you side and support another's actions. . There is a 3rd choice: justice, for all. Find out the truth with all of it. But you adults seem to have a hard time focusing on a factual discussion about it without making it about someone else that did something similar.

There are still many investigations ongoing - we dont know all of what is currently occurring, just as we werent aware in 2016 of the investigations. We arent supposed to be.

Bottom line, both Trump and Clinton have questionable behaviors, and in both politicians, there are major red flags we want addressed.  We are all waiting to see what is actually discovered. It's stupid to compare apples to oranges until then. It is better to objectively identify and acknowledge the facts if you truly want to root out the bad apples, and objectively do the same to root out the bad oranges. One spoiled fruit can quickly make the rest of the barrel go bad.

There cannot be a double standard on honesty or integrity to do this. This report, and many other credible reports,  demonstrate that there are both Anti-Clinton and Anti-Trump bad actors found throughout any entire chain of stakeholders.

Denying facts on either side of the aisle is irresponsible and discrediting. Continuing to do so only promulgates circular controversy, and distracts resources from looking behind the curtain to find out the true diagnosis and potential solution to grave problem. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics