Reply to The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Here is a concise timeline of the events involving the leaks by rogue FBI agents:

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-deep-and-visceral-hatred-the-timeline

[/quote]

See the problem?  This is the delay. They shared info for a month and Comey and co had no clue?

September 27 – October 26th: FBI Agents in New York Field Office contact Rudy Giuliani and share information about existence of Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. [Reuters, April, 19th, 2018][/quote]

You are cherry picking. We don't know the exact date of the leak to Giuliani, but it could have been September 27. In that case, there was no delay. We do know the approximate date of the leak to Nunes and there was definitely no delay in that case:

[quote]'Later September' 2016: Some time between the morning of September 27th and September 30th – four days – 'good FBI agents' from the New York Field Office contact Rep. Devin Nunes (R) and other members of Congress about the existence of Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. [/quote]

You are repeatedly doing two things to justify the leaks by rogue FBI agents:

1) justifying it based on conclusions not found in the IG report that Clinton was wrongly exonerated; and;
2) providing a post hoc justification based on the delay in examining the laptop.

Neither of those things justifies illegal leaks and, as the IG report found, those leaks pushed Comey to write to Congress resulting in a significant negative impact on the campaign for Clinton.

The bottom line is that rogue FBI agents influenced the election to Clinton's detriment. Your failed justifications don't change that.
[/quote]

It was apparently VERY clear to the American public that Comey was wrongly exonerating Clinton, based on his own statement and his conclusions from those statements.

And it seems the American public were correct.

Comey withheld the fact that foreign 'actors' had gotten hold of Hillary's emails. A May 16, 2016 email from Stzrok stated:  “we know foreign actors obtained access” to some Clinton emails, including at least one “secret” message “via compromises of the private email accounts” of Clinton staffers."

That May 16th date is important because it meant Comey knew about this, and knew that at least one document marked Secret, was part of that compromise. Comey told the American people that it was 'possible' when he knew it was certain. Had he told the truth, Clinton probably would have probably been forced to end her candidacy much earlier.

We also know from the IG report that the FBI had been investigating the Clinton Foundation, when they discovered what they called suspicious activity between a foreign donor and the Foundation.  Then the infamous tarmac meeting happened just days before Hillary is exonerated.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/15/fbi-clinton-foundation-investigation/

Anyone who believes there was nothing going on behind the scenes re: Clinton/Foundation/Email is simply not being honest.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics