Reply to Kim Cattrall SJP feud

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Kim Cattrall SJP feud"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t understand Kim’s reaction. I don’t particularly like one of my co-workers and we are definitely not friends, but I still sent my condolences to him when his mom died not because I was trying to be a “nice girl” but because it was the right thing to do.[/quote]

+1.  I thought that's what most people would do if they had manners.[/quote]

That’s different.  It was a co-worker.

If somebody I hated or caused me harm/grief in the past and I wasn’t in friendly or speaking terms and never planned to be—seeing their condolences very soon after a loved one’s death when I knew it wasn’t sincere would cause me further pain.  Not something to inflict on the grieving.[/quote]

I totally disagree.  I would be touched and consider it an olive branch, of sorts.[/quote]

Are you always this naive?[/quote]

NP.  She must be.

This thread is a bunch of nasty, fake mean girls.   SJP was live on BFF Andy Cohen’s show doing her gee gosh golly routine the day before Cattrall used social media to send an alert about her missing brother (that’s for the “posting on SM is sooooo tacky!!” crowd.).  That’s also why it seems reasonable to me that Cattrall issued a statement about what happened to her brother, and thanks for some condolences.  And it’s also why SJP is trash and wannabe slick for posting “Dearest Kim” when she was fresh out from acting out her feud with Cohen dressed, wig and all, as Cattrall, to AGAIN be the victim in their feud.   That is so crass and manipulative as is trashing Cattrall.  When you’ve públically and gleefully trashed someone on live TV 24 hours before they endure a tragedy, maybe leave them the hell alone?   Performative tragedy vulturing is what shitty people do.  Unsurprisingly it’s a popular option for think-they’re-classy SATC fans.[/quote]

What in the world are you talking about? When Andy Cohen mentioned Kim Cattrall not returning being the reason SATC 3 wasn't happened, SJP didn't respond to the comment at all. The scene they did wasn't something they made up to make fun of Cattrall, it was part of the script from a S5 episode (she was laughing at herself and the show as well). Third, when they later returned to talking about the movie again, they talked about other casting options (something Cattrall had already endorsed months before), and the only reference to Cattrall was mentioning how perfect she was in the Samantha role, which SJP agreed with. At no point in the episode did she speak a negative word about Cattrall. Side note, they're all all tipsy if not drunk while filiming WWHL, so if anything SJP's comments there were even more "honest" and unscripted than in her other interviews. And yet she still didn't trash Cattrall. I have no trouble believing that they weren't friends, and it's entirely possible SJP doesn't particularly care for Cattrall, but if that's true, if anything SJP has been that much classier not dragging her through the mud every time she's invited to.

As for the timing relative to Cattrall posting about her brother being missing, I'm not really sure the connection you're drawing there. The episode aired four days before Cattrall posted that her brother was missing, five days before she posted that he had died. Was SJP supposed to know that was going to happen when she filmed the show?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics