Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Insider Perspectives from a Highly Selective Admissions Office"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]"I agree the push to specialize is harmful, and for that I place full blame on the colleges. Honestly, I think little weight should be given to extracurriculars." I think the thing people forget is that the point of specializing is NOT to become a world expert and then fight to avoid ever learning a new subject. The point of specializing is learning to become good at SOMETHING in HS so that in college and in grad school and every few years after you have an idea what to do next to find your next project and know how the process of becoming good at something works. If you read this: http://mitadmissions.org/apply/process/stats You begin to get the idea that the focus on extracurriculars in admissions is to make sure that students have NOT achieved their high grades and test scores by studying around the clock. It may be a chicken and egg situation, but I don't think you can blame the colleges for trying to find students who have talents other than their ability to delay gratification. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics