Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to ""Teacher of the Year" quits over Common Core tests"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hopeless. [b]We've given lots of examples of poor standards.[/b] If these standards are so good: please document.[/quote] Actually, I've posted almost all of the standards that have posted. The discussion has mostly gone like this. Me: *posts standard* Is this a bad standard? anti-CCSS poster: LOL yes. Me: Why? anti-CCSS poster: Well, duh. Sometimes there is more detail in the response. For example, -"It's not measurable" (except that it is; I think that these anti-CCSS posters don't necessarily understand measurement) -"It's developmentally inappropriate" (which begs the question; specifically what about it is developmentally inappropriate?) -"It's badly written" (the copy-editor issue; unfortunately the copy-editors so far have not provided any editing suggestions) [b]And no, I don't need to document that the standards are good. You're the one saying that they're not good; it's on you to support what you're saying[/b].[/quote] Well, there's some great Common Core critical thinking for you. No, it really is on you and the rest of the establishment to prove these standards are good. [b]Otherwise, we won't continue jumping through hoops[/b]. [/quote] I guess that will show me? Actually the idea that you have to support what you're saying is explicitly in the Common Core State Standards, for example here in this fourth-grade standard: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.4.1 Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. I don't think it's a radical, unprecedented, way-out-there idea. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics