Reply to DC's School Report Cards are up. Any surprises?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DC's School Report Cards are up. Any surprises?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Again for those who missed it: Stuart-Hobson has nearly identical CAPE scores and other quantitative metrics to DCI.

DCI has slightly more kids meeting or exceeding expectations in math (60.9% to 57.2%). S-H has slightly more kids meeting or exceeding expectations in ELA (59.9% to 56.8%).

They have near identical chronic absentee rates (just under 20% for both). S-H has a better teacher retention rate (84% to 73%).

S-H is easier to get into OOB than DCI is to get into without coming from a feeder. However, it's not that hard to access a feeder for either school -- if you are willing to change schools in 3rd/4th/5th, both have feeders where you are very likely or guaranteed a spot via lottery.

The biggest advantage of DCI is the HS. For MS, there is no advantage unless the language component is very important to you. If your preferred HS is a private or application school anyway, there's no real difference.[/quote]

[b]There is a huge advantage to DCI over SH because DCI is able to meet the top students where they are and challenge them.  Kids are not in classes with other kids who are 3 or 4 grade levels apart.  They actually work to place kids by ability with most subjects, and the only middle school in this city that I know that uses standardized test scores as part of this placement in addition to grades and teachers recs.  
[/b]
So the lower performing kids are not in the same classes as the top performing kids.  The top kids get more depth and challenge to meet them where they are.  In addition, based on standardized test scores, the lower kids automatically get more classes in ELA, math etc.. instead of an elective so more support.  It is not optional, they are placed in it.

This is how DCI is able to meet the needs of both the high and low performing students. In addition, they have high standards to be placed in the higher ability classes.  For instance the highest track math class, the requirement is 90% or higher in math on standardized tests.  So there are no kids in the class who should not be in it and the class can go deeper and be much more challenging. Not so with DCPS middle schools where OSSE doesn’t believe in tracking because of equity.  BTW, DCI has multiple levels of math classes.

Also you should look at test scores more.  I suspect lots of kids at SH are getting tutors to try to get the kids up to speed.  It sounds like the tutor in this post has lots of these kids from DCPS middle schools in CH.

Lastly, the high school is even better because there are multiple official tracks for kids to actually pick where their interests lies.  The school also realizes that not all kids are destined for college and has some vocational tracks that will give kids the skills they need to get jobs after high school.[/quote]

This part is ironic, because SH uses standardized test scores to track students (as do EH and Jefferson per their open houses).[/quote]

The only track that DCPS middle schools do is math and at these schools like the ones at CH the higher track is just grade level.  It’s not like the track is as advanced and kids are ready to take AP Cal by 10th grade.

Plus DCI uses standardized test scores to place in many of the other subjects too.  That is not happening in DCPS.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics