Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Jesus' Historicity"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Jesus evidence example (exactly the case we’ve been discussing) People commit a category error when they say: “There’s no archaeological evidence or contemporaneous outsider documentation for Jesus → therefore he probably didn’t exist.” That reasoning only works if Jesus belonged to the category of people who normally leave archaeological or contemporaneous records (emperors, governors, high priests, famous rabbis, rebel leaders who mint coins, wealthy benefactors who commission inscriptions, etc.). But Jesus belonged to a completely different category: 1st-century Galilean peasant itinerant preacher. For that category, the normal, expected evidence profile is: -Zero archaeology -Zero contemporaneous outsider records Demanding that a member of Category B produce the evidence typical of Category A — and then declaring him “probably fictional” when he doesn’t — is a textbook category error. It’s like saying: “I looked in the sky and didn’t see any fish → therefore fish don’t exist.” (Fish belong in water, not the sky.) Or: “I dug in the desert and didn’t find any whales → therefore whales are a myth.” (Whales belong in the ocean.) In the same way: “I looked for inscriptions and Roman police reports about Jesus and didn’t find any → therefore Jesus is a myth.” (Those kinds of records belong to emperors and governors, not Galilean carpenters.) That’s the category error in a nutshell. Once you place Jesus in the correct historical category (lower-class apocalyptic Jewish preacher in Roman Palestine), the total archaeological and contemporaneous silence becomes the expected default, not a problem. [/quote] You are confusing posters. I'm simply saying there is zero evidence. Nothing about his existence. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics