Reply to Connecticut Ave bike lanes are back!

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Connecticut Ave bike lanes are back!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What if the goal was a safe and thriving neighborhood?  If you want a dedicated tunnel to downtown then take Metro.[/quote]

If the goal is a safe and thriving neighborhood then the impact of any plan on accidents and traffic volume within the neighborhood is vitally important.

If your goal is to ban cars that's simply not happening.[/quote]

A safe and vibrant neighborhood has bike lanes.[/quote]

Pretty sure there are many, many safe and vibrant neighborhoods that don’t have bike lanes.[/quote]

But how many neighborhoods have bike lanes that aren't safe and vibrant?[/quote]

Lots. You especially see this in other cities that haven’t been overrun with gentrification.[/quote]

If there's one thing we can take off the table absolutely when it comes to this particular bike lane debate, it's gentrification. You can't gentrify out the landed gentry.[/quote]

Bike lanes are not about gentrification but they are about density, vibrancy and smart growth.  Connecticut Ave has had the reputation of being rather boring and, well, old.  Bike lanes add a certain hipness factor to attract younger buyers and renters.  This is the group that developers who want to build dense housing need to attract.[/quote]

Uh rent is expensive. Owning and storing a car is expensive. Younger people who have lower disposable income depend on biking to get around. [b]So if the city wants to continue to attract these post-college younger residents, bike lanes is a great way to do it.[/b][/quote]

DC attracts plenty of single post-college younger residents (and in any case it’s doubtful that many want to live in Chevy Chase DC or Cleveland Park vs U St or Petworth).  DC needs to do more to retain families who otherwise move to the suburbs  better quality public schools and overall public services.  Conn. ave. Bike lanes aren’t at the top of their priority list.[/quote]

For a lot of younger families who are car free or car-light, yes they are. You clearly have no idea of the demographic shift away from the Boomer-led car era.[/quote]

That's not a lot of people in total though.
[/quote]

Please quantify the statement. I dont think you understand how expensive housing in relative to younger two income families.[/quote]

The amount of that demographic buying in Upper NW off of Connecticut is very small and overwhelmingly offset by normies.

I don't think you understand the neighborhoods you are trying to push this into.  The people you are talking about don't live up there.  [/quote]

I have lived in Cleveland Park for almost 40 years. I think I know the neighborhood. Yes, there are a lot of 4 million dollar + houses. There are also a lot of row houses and condos that are a lot less, and the blocks and blocks of duplexes in "North Cleveland Park" have tons of these families.

Maybe you need to get out more.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics