Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/yvonnewingett/status/1753484439638929437[/twitter][/quote]

The affidavit attached to the response destroys the whole (already weak) conflict of interest narrative.  The relationship started after he was hired, so she didn't "hire her boyfriend" as was alleged.  And Willis has paid for travel for him in addition to him buying it for her.  McAfee will hold a hearing to confirm the facts and then deny the motion.  MAGAs heads will explode.[/quote]

[twitter]https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/1752887802146984090[/twitter]

[/quote]

So media statements during a campaign are now the basis for disqualification?  Go ahead with that one.  I'm sure the judge will take that very seriously.[/quote]

I guess not in today's world with adultery, lying, and plagiarism defended by more than a few as acceptable behavior. [/quote]

Are republicans going to start pretending they care about these things again?  Because let me tell you about this serial adulterer and liar who is going to be the republican nominee.[/quote]

PP here. Trust me, I'm disgusted by anyone who lies, cheats, steals, commits adultery, etc. I don't care who it is. They're all phony hypocrites. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics