Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Bad Art Friend"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am on page 68 now. Taking notes as I go: Larson/Ng dynamic devolved because of groupthink - sounds like they started out gossiping about her look-at-me drama and then the book, but then when Dawn started pursuing Sonya legally and/or trying to cancel her, it got meaner with Ng being the mean girl ring leader. However, there has to be some more backstory we aren't getting about why Dawn made them so spiteful in the first place. The code switching discussion is actually really interesting and I can see that as a reason for Dawn not able to fit in. However, everyone is assuming that none of the Chunky Monkeys or Grub Street people had similar outcast-type or poor backgrounds. They could possibly have had similar backgrounds with similar trauma but they don’t feel the need to bring it up like she does as excuse for everything that has happened in her adult life, or make it the defining issue as she does. I think the blue check marks confused the FICTIONAL account of Rose with the person of Dawn when they went down the white woman savior path during the twitter pile-on. NYT looks bad. It was poor reporting. Nobody looks good here accept the few people who have dispassionately put things in a timeline order. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics