Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year not calendar "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is it likely? What logical justification would MLSN and GA have that outweighs the risks of isolating themselves from the pipeline and other elite leagues. [/quote] They want to make it harder to identify talent at the ulittle ages? [/quote] How would having 2 groupings make it more difficult to identify talent at ulittle ages. If anything there would be double the number of players identified.[/quote] No club is going to take the time or put resources into keeping two different registrations, MLSN may stay BY but they will be recruiting from SY system, can you tell me how that smooths things out for talent identification? [/quote] It all depends on if the BY/SY arms race works its way down into the youngers. And even then clubs can put together BY teams in a SY league. So it all comes down to pipeline and recruiting.[/quote] You are unbelievably clueless, or trolling.[/quote] And you are working double time to affirm the opinions going on in your head.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics