Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So what term should be used for hiring a crisis PR firm to promote negative information about a person through social media in order to vilify them? [/quote]

You don’t hire a crisis P.R. firm to attack another person, you hire them to defend yourself.  This is presumably also why Blake hired Nick Shapiro after her lawsuit backfired on the pr front.

In any case, it’s Blake and her lawyers who keep calling it a smear campaign — even The NY Times article had smear in the title.[/quote]

This is just clearly wrong, though. From evidence we’ve seen, we know that celebrities hire crisis PR firms — and, specifically, hire Melissa Nathan’s crisis PR firm TAG — to defend them but also create defamatory websites attacking their enemies. While at the e same time hiring Bryan Freedman as their lawyer.

So you’re just typing out lies here hoping people believe your version rather than the truth. Similar to Amber Heard. [/quote]

You live in La La land.  Blake has already run crying to judge that she could find no evidence to support her allegations because every single bit of it must have been auto deleted by Signal or some such even though she had improper and unfettered access to Jen Abel’s phone for months.  There’s no there there.[/quote]

You desperately keep tying to convince everyone of that yet we are still moving forward. You must be getting a little worried.[/quote]

Why would we not be moving forward?  The only dispositive motions filed by WF are still pending.  Not worried at all.  [/quote]

Stomping your feet insisting there's nothing to see is ridiculous at this stage. [/quote]

At the summary judgment stage?  We’ve seen both Blake’s opposition and the reply briefs (From which we can tell a lot about the redacted parts of Blake’s opposition).  Very underwhelming.

Honestly, however, we are arguing about dispute fact issues.  WF’s best chances with the dispositive motions are actually with respect to choice of law and Blake’s contract and employment status arguments.  A lot of her claims are at risk.[/quote]

Baldoni PR hard at work today.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics