Reply to ECNL moving to school year not calendar

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year not calendar "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]MLSN will start their own pre-MLS league U10-12 and will have 3 tiers of MLSN leagues for clubs. They are working on developing this for their clubs.

Next year be ready to hear about it.

MLSN, MLSN 2, MLSN 3 and Pre MLSN. [/quote]
It would be funny if this happened.

All the littles leagues who currently have all the registrations before u13 will suddently be cut in half. All because they listened to ECNL. If they had done nothing they'd have more money and no extra work.[/quote]

It wasn’t ECNLs doing per se.  The switch to BY last decade wasn’t a sound move and most clubs and parents were wanting to switch back.  Those opposed were mostly parents with kids born in Jan-June.  [/quote]
What's done is done. You can't turn back time.

If MLSN chooses to create a "Pre-MLSN" league the number of US Club registered players will go down because MLSN wont use US Club.

Basically the whole BY to SY distraction will only cost US Club money translating to less paying customers overall.[/quote]

You are really holding on tight aren’t you…[/quote]
Just because you dont like the facts doesn't make them untrue.

If MLSN moves into the younger ages and stays BY, US Club will lose paying customers.[/quote]

MLSN loses more.  They lose players wanting SY for HS, college recruiting and/or RAE advantage.  Of your top players who don’t want to go pro and fit better in the SY cohort , they will go ECNL or whatever replaces ECNL in the future.  MLSN won’t do something to close off this market.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics