Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So what term should be used for hiring a crisis PR firm to promote negative information about a person through social media in order to vilify them? [/quote]

There’s an inherent flaw in your question - you’re assuming the negative information did not already “vilify” the subject in question.

Blake has no one to blame but herself for several poor choices and she’s been criticized for them before by others and also now.

No one from Wayfarer’s side was blasting her for the weird wardrobe choices when early filming shots started going around social media. That was organic commentary.

She got blowback for her wedding and her Preserve lifestyle brand. That had nothing to do with Wayfarer.

A more appropriate question would be to ask what liability, if any, does a party have in promoting or sharing information that is already public, memorialized, or perceived as negative?

[/quote]

I didn’t ask what if what I described in my PP was what happened here. I asked what term one would use to describe those actions. Because the starting point is that a swear campaign requires spreading false information. So what is the term for what I described?

If you don’t want to answer that, then can you provide a term for the actions described in paragraphs 29-36 of Lively’s amended complaint. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics