Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m going with the Cambridge and Oxford Dictionaries over Wikipedia. [/quote] PP wasn’t citing the Oxford English Dictionary. It’s was google AI’s “Oxford Languages” dictionary, which is found at https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/ Regardless, I don’t think a judge is going to let definition of the word smear campaign determine the outcome of this case. It’s going to hinge on whether the actions taken by the defendants amount to retaliation. And retaliation does not require spreading falsehoods. Nor is it limited to firing, negative reviews, being passed over for a promotion or any of the more egregious examples provided by an early poster. I feel like there are too many posters commenting who repeatedly attempt to refine legal terms. As PP mentioned, getting a jury to agree with less direct forms of SH and retaliation will be a heavier lift, but that is common across multiple areas of litigation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
