Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Lasso911]I think this could all be avoided if these boys clubs focused on the basic philosophy of building a solid foundation at U littles. BRYC U littles-Pretty behind across U9-U12 VYS U littles-Very Behind Mclean- Getting better but U9s seem to be the strongest group out of all.[/quote] Is this boys or girls? Where are you getting this from? I can’t get pre-ECNL stats to load on the ECNL app for any club’s 2012s or 2013s. That said, I would be surprised if this was true on the girls’ side. It would certainly break the last 4+ years’ trends, where you had SYC —> VYS —> MYS —> BRYC. While the boys’ side has been the clear driver of this, I think another part of it was Union losing the incoming SYC 2012 girls. The biggest opportunity in this might be the BRYC uLittles, where the parent-coached bridge teams and lack of organization fragment the talent and slow development. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
