Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year not calendar "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All this begs the question, is staying BY for MLSN/GA worth all the trouble and potential downsides?[/quote] What potential downsides? 𤣠[/quote]No downsides if they just pull a DA and close up shop without warning.[/quote] DA didnt really "close up shop without warning". At least on the girls side everyone knew free soccer doesnt work if someone or some kind of action wasnt footing the bill. US Soccer wanted out and MLS wanted in. Which is why MLS Next exists today as a direct replacement of boys DA. Girls DA is a little more complicated because it never should have existed in the first place. Im sure US Soccer approached NWSL to take the girls side over and they simply said no. Which is when a bunch of clubs went back to ECNL and everyone else grouped together and created GA. If you read through the early GA documentation the intent was always to have NWSL take over GA and create Acadamies just like MLS did with the boys. When this didn't happen GA pivoted and copied ECNL. From a business perspective ECNL could have had it all if they would have just let all the DA clubs in. But they chose to only let certain clubs in. And now GA exists as their biggest competitor. [/quote] What i like about today vs 5 years ago is that because of the ranking app ECNLs mistake of only letting certain clubs in when DA blew up is easy to see. Before the ranking app there were ranking sites that were literally pay to play marketing and they'd print whatever they were paid to say. This still exists but nobody cares anymore if what's being written doesnt sync with the ranking app its garbage. I cant stress how bad it was when recruiters would contact clubs based on articles written by websites that were 100% paid for by leagues. I see this same type of thing happening for players with stats as AI becomes better able to identify skills. As an example right now with forwards its easy to see who can finish. But, how do you identify mids and defenders? Eventually this will all be assessed by AI and coaches/docs will lose their power to pick favorites.[/quote] The rankings app is awful. It is MARGINALLY better than GotSport / USARank.[/quote] Give me a break. Before the ranking app who was the best club was determined by who paid which site the most $$$. For better or worse the ranking app provides a consistent and cearly defined way to rank teams. That isnt influenced by $$$. [/quote] You didnāt really respond to the PP. š§ You just made an unsubstantiated loosely related secondary claim about paying for rankings. Neither GotSport, nor USARank are paid rankingsā¦so where is this coming from? Soccer Rankings app is about as accurate as GotSport and USARank, none are very good, and they all pull from the same data sources. [/quote] Anyone that puts GotSport or USA rank in the same galaxy as soccer rankings knows absolutely nothing about data analytics. Only saving grace is that it is Monday morning so they are back at their job at the CBOš[/quote] Thanks for responding as I didn't have time earlier when I read that! Just to inform others, they absolutely do not pull from the same sources which is exactly why the app is far better than GotSoccer. Gotsoccer only pulls from events on their own platform and gives out points based on poorly defined tiers (championship/platnum/gold/etc). GotSoccer also heavily rewards just playing more events (hence the paying comment) vs quality. Rankings app is just pure w/l with SOS adjustments as pointed out before - https://usasportstatistics.net/ They also do a much better job of capturing all the results vs. just what is on GotSoccer. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics